As reported a few days ago, Counter-Strike 2 players using Radeon yono business sbi Anti-Lag+ technology in the latest GPU drivers were finding that it didn't help matters at all. In fact, it resulted in accounts being banned as Valve's anti-cheat system didn't like the latency reduction system. AMD's response to the whole problem? Yank the drivers off the download page.
Before you think I'm having a go at AMD here, this is absolutely the correct thing to do. Not weeks of radio silence, promising a fix is coming soon, or blaming somebody else for the issue. By stopping anyone from downloading the problematic drivers, AMD is properly taking responsibility for it all.
So why has this happened? AMD's Anti-Lag+ system works on a per-game basis and basically injects itself into a specified game's code. It streamlines the synchronisation of frames between the CPU and GPU, resulting in a lowering of the overall latency. In turn, this makes the game feel a tad more responsive, so for competitive shooters like Counter-Strike 2 the benefits are obvious.
However, it would seem that VAC (Valve Anti-Cheat) doesn't like another piece of software poking about with the insides of the game and automatically determines this is an attempt to cheat. Hence the account bans.
A fix will come eventually, of course, after Valve and AMD have worked together to prevent VAC from getting all antsy with Anti-Lag+ but what about yono business those players who have already been banned? According to the Counter-Strike Twitter account, '[o]nce AMD ships an update we can do the work of identifying affected users and reversing their ban.'
Best CPU for gaming: The top chips from Intel and AMD.
Best gaming motherboard: The right boards.
Best graphics card: Your perfect pixel-pusher awaits.
Best SSD for gaming: Get into the game ahead of the rest.
So all is not lost for the CS2 fans sporting a Radeon graphics card who've been hit with the ban hammer, just for activating a simple feature.
One thing is puzzling me, though. Did AMD actually work with Valve in the first place to develop Anti-Lag+ for Counter-Strike 2? I would have assumed they did because it seems like it's an ideal marketing promotion for the technology. After all, Nvidia did the same for its Reflex system, which also does a spot of code injection, but as far as I can tell using that hasn't resulted in any account bans.
It's easy to point fingers, blame developers, and bark at the moon for problems with GPU drivers, but I can't help but feel that maybe, just maybe, AMD should have taken a little more care with the overall implementation of Anti-Lag+.